The Chicago Bar Association

Unemployment Hearings

I have represented employees in over 600 unemployment hearings before Administrative Law Judges/ Referees with the Illinois Department of Employment Security (“IDES”) and other states, as well as in numerous appeals to the IDES Board of Review - and I have a tremendously good track record.

Over and over again my involvement in representing claimant employees has resulted in our winning and my clients receiving their unemployment compensation benefits. In particular, I can more than level the playing field, and I can give you the advantage at the unemployment hearing.

Typical IDES Referee Hearing claims involve whether or not an employee has voluntarily left his or her employment (601) or whether or not the employee was discharged as a result of the employee committing misconduct (602).

In a hearing where misconduct is claimed, the burden of proof is on the employer to prove misconduct. Although an employee may very well have made a mistake during his/her employment that led to the employer terminating that employee, the employer needs to show not merely that the employee was negligent but rather that the employee’s conduct rose to the level of constituting misconduct - which is a substantially higher burden.

In resignation cases (which are very difficult to win because the IDES does not like to give unemployment compensation benefits to employees who voluntarily leave their employment) the burden of proof is on the employee to prove either that the employee’s leaving of his/her employment was for good cause attributable to the employer or that the employee’s leaving was due to a documented health reason.

Individuals should realize that the Referee Hearings (which are usually conducted by telephone) are actual hearings (mini-trials) with evidence taken and with there being numerous unwritten (or difficult to find) rules for how the hearings are conducted. The employer is frequently represented by either an attorney or by a non-attorney representative service, and so an employee who does not have a representative is at a substantial disadvantage.

During the hearing you will have an opportunity to give testimony on questioning from the IDES Hearings Referee and follow-up questioning from your attorney (if you have an attorney). If you don’t have an attorney then it is likely that relevant information potentially helpful to your position may not come out during the hearing.

The Employer’s representative will also be able to cross-examine you (ask you questions), and you (or your attorney, if you have one) will likewise be able to cross-examine the employer’s witnesses. Note, in this regard, that most claimant employees do not have experience/ skill in cross-examination, and so without having an attorney the employee is losing out on a big opportunity to draw out inconsistencies in the Employer’s witnesses’ testimony and otherwise show that the Employer’s witnesses are not being truthful.

Documents can also be introduced during the hearing, but you need to follow the IDES’s procedures (they have to be sent to the Hearings Referee and to the Employer/ Employer’s representative so that they are received at least 24 hours before the hearing). In this regard, you may have excellent documents showing the truth of your position, and that the Employer is lying, but if you don’t follow the IDES-required procedures then you will not be able to use those documents at the hearing, and they will not do you any good, potentially to your great detriment.

If you have applied for unemployment benefits/ have an unemployment hearing coming up then - whether you have an attorney or not - toward your being best prepared you certainly should see the following very helpful linked information that I have written:

Due to my extensive experience in handling unemployment matters - and my strong interest in obtaining justice for my employee clients - over the years I have developed a particular method for preparing for the hearing that not only results in my being well-prepared for the hearing but also has my clients well-prepared and much more at ease than they otherwise would be (which along with my thorough preparation greatly helps to get good and just results for my clients).

  • Do you have a Referee Hearing coming up?
  • Do you need to appeal to the IDES Board of Review or to Circuit Court?

If you believe that you should be entitled to unemployment compensation benefits and you have a Referee Hearing coming up or you are considering appealing to the IDES Board of Review or to Circuit Court, then call me to briefly discuss if it makes sense for you to come in for an appointment to my Chicago loop office to further discuss your IDES unemployment situation.

Labor Day 2009Labor Day
Labor Day 2010Labor Day
Labor Day 2011Labor Day
Labor Day 2012Labor Day
Labor Day 2013Labor Day
Labor Day 2014Labor Day
Labor Day 2015Labor Day
Labor Day 2016Labor Day
Labor Day 2017Labor Day
Labor Day 2018Labor Day
Client Reviews
"I found David Porter's representation of me to be both professional and compassionate. He did a solid job of explaining my legal options and provided me with real world examples of how labor/employment law works. His support and advocacy helped me to get through a very difficult time in my professional life. I would without hesitation highly recommend him to a friend in need of a seasoned practitioner." Jack
"I can't thank you enough for dealing with the bureaucracy of the Indiana and Illinois unemployment offices. Their response to my individual communications seemed to be the default answer of "No". With your help and persistence you were able to cut through the red tape and win my Trade Adjustment Assistance, allowing me to pursue my Master's of Science in Electrical and Computer Engineering. It is a good feeling to know I can call on such a great resource in trying times." Marc
"After finding myself in a terrible position with a former employer to whom my fate was at their mercy, David Porter stepped in and negotiated a settlement plan that not only kept me out of court, but also prevented any negative references or information being leaked out to possibly hinder my future growth as a professional." Mike